So nobody else interested to sponsor a programmer who goes for TABLES or CTABLES funktion (tbd) in PSPP?
Or else: Any programmer out there who is interested to do the job? Regards Matthias 2015-02-20 11:43 GMT+01:00 Matthias Faeth <m.fa...@gmx.de>: > I agree that the SPSS GUI for CTABLES is of not much use (at least in SPSS > 17 the lastes that I used) . > > I for myself would be contend if PSPP would support the code of CTABLES > (but not only TABLES as Frank oviously states). > > So no integration into PSPPire but only into PSPP would be fine for me. > > Matthias > > 2015-02-19 23:13 GMT+01:00 F. Thomas <frank_tho...@orange.fr>: > >> >> On 17/02/2015 23:23, Crichton, Ronald wrote: >> >> I work for a govt agency. They may not come up with money, but I could >> put an argument that as they are currently paying about $2000 per year for >> an SPSS licence a proportion of that may be a good investment. >> >> >> >> Actually, I don’t like the version of CTABLES spss currently has. I used >> to use it on v10 SPSS in about 1990 and found it relatively intuitive to >> use. I haven’t quite got into the same comfort zone I used to be in back >> then as with the current version. I don’t know why it would have been >> changed. Rather than PSPP simply copying SPSS perhaps it could be improved. >> >> I support this. The original TABLES command was quite simple and >> relatively easy to master. I thought of TABLES when I supported the idea. >> >> This is a SPSS 12 flyer which shows the initial, simple lay out : >> http://www.spss.ch/upload/1069238369_SPSS%2012.0%20Tables.pdf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pspp-users mailing list >> Pspp-users@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Pspp-users mailing list Pspp-users@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
