Thanks John.
Alan, I'm sorry if I got your intention wrong.

kind regards,
Michal

2014-12-31 16:49 GMT+01:00 John Darrington <j...@darrington.wattle.id.au>:

> I don't think Alan was trying to be disparaging.
>
> Bug reports are always welcome (although bug-gnu-p...@gnu.org might have
> been
> a better place to report it).  In fact, we rely on users' feedback in order
> to improve the software.
>
> J'
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 04:09:08PM +0100, Michał Dubrawski wrote:
>      Dear Alan,
>
>      Although what you are saying are things that could be improved in
> PSPP you
>      should remember that PSPP is still under development - it is not
> version
>      1.0.
>
>      Even in version 1.0 I believe there could be and probably will be
> things
>      worth improving - recently I had SPSS version 22 installed on my
> computer
>      in the office - first my colleagues from IT department installed SPSS
>      itself, and then a very large file with bug fixes. Not long ago we
> had here
>      on PSPP mailing list a large discussion about bugs in various
> versions of
>      SPSS - I myself know person who found some mistakes in SPSS tables
> output
>      (it was probably version 12, 13 or 15 then - sorry I don't remember)
> and
>      after some time received bug fixes correcting this output.
>
>      And SPSS is commercial product, each version they distribute is
> considered
>      to be complete and ready to be used.
>
>      PSPP is developed by people who do that by their goodwill. PSPP is not
>      finished and sometimes we all find things that we want to do but it's
> not
>      possible because these features are not yet implemented, but I really
>      appreciate the work of PSPP developers and all the people supporting
> the
>      project. With current PSPP I can do many things the SPSS-way even
> when I
>      don't have access to SPSS, and some things are easier for me to be
> done
>      that way rather than in R or recently in Python (although there are
> other
>      data operations and analysis that are much easier for me to be done
> in R or
>      Python).
>
>
>      Happy New Year to all of you :-)
>      Michał Dubrawski
>
>
>
> --
> PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
> fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285  A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
> See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users

Reply via email to