On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:43:57PM +0200, John Darrington wrote: > Perhaps we should reword it to something like "This function is not > available in this version of PSPP". I am reluctant to use the word > "supported" like so many proprietary software vendors seem to throw > around, because in PSPP (as in most proprietary software) absolutely > *nothing* is "supported" unless one has taken out an explicit support > contract.
I changed the wording to the one that you suggested. _______________________________________________ Pspp-users mailing list Pspp-users@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
