On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 02:29:50PM -0400, Andrew Choens wrote:
I managed to convince Linux.com to let me write a short piece on PSPP,
and it was published today @
http://www.linux.com/feature/150363
I have now learned that Linux.com is willing to edit without notifying
the author. There are a couple of edits which unintentionally, I assume,
affect the meaning of what "I" wrote.
But, even with these edits, I think it's a fairly decent 2-cent review
of PSPP. I don't think this software has gotten a lot of attention in
the Linux press, but with the addition of psppire to the mix, I think
this program has the potential to attract more users and I hope that
came through in the article, even though they removed the sentence where
I said it directly.It reads well. Well done. One of the facts of life when writing journal articles, especially for popular magazines is that the editor always reserves the right to do what (s)he likes with your work. J' -- PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3 fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Pspp-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users
