On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 03:26:53PM -0400, Andy Choens wrote:
> I think this project could benefit from the kind of positive attention  
> that other projects like Gnash get. Given the high quality of the 0.6.0  
> release, I'm surprised by the minimal promotion of PSPP within the FOSS  
> community / press. True, it's not as flashy as FSF projects like Gnash,  
> but it is equally important in creating more opportunities to get people  
> using FOSS.



> If none of the developers object, I will spend a couple of evenings and  
> write a simple review/article and  submit it to a linux news site  
> (linux.com comes to mind)....

Sounds good to me.

> And, since I'm sticking my foot solidly in my mouth with this post, I  
> should pony up and volunteer. I can't help but notice that the  
> documentation that's on the site is a little out of date (0.4). What  
> should I do to get involved with helping with documentation?

It looks like the web page is still showing the old 0.4 manual. It
just needs to have the new manual put there. I think John maintains
the web page.

-Jason



_______________________________________________
Pspp-users mailing list
Pspp-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-users

Reply via email to