A quote I just seen on DXP list Would it not be nice to be asked the same type of questions on the SCH and PCB tools that have been the 'bread & butter' for Altium for so long instead of just the 'new Altium baby'.
When you see such feedback, well, I can only repeat myself. I really do see the 2004 roadmap as being a positive move, but they are making it real hard for themselves. >From a feature point of view I would have paid my upgrade bucks for dual monitor, multi channel, better Orcad compatibility and proper schematic driven rule sets and leave the 99SE style interface. Proper pin / gate swapping, a VERY high wish on all users wish list, still has not made it, but would have been nice, but we have FPGA tools, so much better than pin / gate swapping. John > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 12, 2004 12:00 AM > To: DXP Technical Forum > Subject: Re: [dxp] NanoBoard > > snipped < > > I would be interested to know why you feel the need to use > ISE and what areas of it are most interesting / useful to you. > > Best Regards, > > Nick * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * To leave this list visit: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/leave.html * * Contact the list manager: * mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * Forum Guidelines Rules: * http://www.techservinc.com/protelusers/forumrules.html * * Browse or Search previous postings: * http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
