Ok, thanks for confirming my suspicion 👍

On Wednesday, November 22, 2023 at 1:01:51 PM UTC+1 Bryan Boreham wrote:

> Federation is a bit of a neglected feature.  The Thanos project is rather 
> more popular as a way to aggregate data from multiple Prometheus.
>
> (Other projects also exist which can let you centralise metrics storage)
>
> Bryan
>
> On Thursday, 16 November 2023 at 15:51:12 UTC [email protected] wrote:
>
>> I take the silence as a "no, it is not possible to connect recording 
>> rules with federation requests (or vice versa)" ...?
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 31, 2023 at 5:54:05 PM UTC+1 [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> *Is it possible to include an aggregation formula in a federation query?*
>>> This would avoid creating and storing aggregated metrics on the 
>>> lower-level Prometheus, and also remove the delay between aggregation and 
>>> federation.
>>>
>>> *Or, can a recording rule fetch metrics directly from another Prometheus 
>>> server?*
>>> This would avoid the delay between federation and execution of the 
>>> recording rule.
>>>
>>> We've got hundreds of pods, delivering millions of metrics. We plan to 
>>> partition our pods and deploy one Prometheus per partition. A top-level 
>>> Prometheus will then offer globally aggregated metrics.
>>>
>>> How should we set this up? My current assumption is based on aggregation 
>>> recording rules within each partition, then again at the top-level to get 
>>> the global aggregation. This seems both complicated and a waste of 
>>> resources, plus also introduces delays since recording rules and federation 
>>> cannot be synced to each other.
>>>
>>> To minimize delay, each partition-level Prometheus needs to aggregate as 
>>> often as possible to offer "fresh" metrics to federation requests. Then the 
>>> top level Prometheus also needs to federate these aggregated metrics as 
>>> often as possible to offer "fresh" values at the global level. Doing things 
>>> as often as possible "just in case" seems wasteful, which is why I am 
>>> asking if this is the right approach for us.
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-users/ab32c10a-eb9d-4867-bb6f-de47c342983bn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to