So Whites should only votes for Whites then. 

--- On Sat, 11/13/10, Leland Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Leland Jackson <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OT] Obama's attorney general going after Cristi but ignores 
> Black Panthers
> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Saturday, November 13, 2010, 9:16 PM
> On 11/13/2010 06:56 PM, Michael
> Madigan wrote:
> > When 97% of Blacks vote for Obama, it doesn't get any
> more racist than that.
> 
> Your statement is twisted.  When used as an adjective,
> a racist might be 
> defined as someone who is intolerant, or someone who makes
> racial 
> remarks, or someone that discriminates, especially on the
> basis of race 
> or religion, (eg anti-black, anti-Semitic types). 
> When used as a noun, 
> a racist is a person with a prejudiced belief that one race
> is superior 
> to others, (eg racialist).
> 
> The overwhelming support President Obama received from the
> African 
> Americans had nothing to do with racism.  The blacks
> voted for President 
> Obama; because, they identified with him, they admired his
> courage in 
> running for the hightest office in the land, they felt he
> was the 
> candidate most likely to represent their best interest, and
> they felt he 
> was the candidate best equipped to handle the critical
> issue created 
> during the Bush Presidency, that needed immediate
> attention.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> LelandJ
> 
> 
> 
>   2: discriminatory especially on the basis of race or
> religion
>   [syn: antiblack, anti-Semitic, anti-Semite(a)]
>   n : a person with a prejudiced belief that one race
> is superior
>   to others [syn: racialist]
> 
> 
> "Racist"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Sat, 11/13/10, Michael Oke, II<[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Michael Oke, II<[email protected]>
> >> Subject: Re: [OT] Obama's attorney general going
> after Cristi but ignores Black Panthers
> >> To: "ProFox Email List"<[email protected]>
> >> Date: Saturday, November 13, 2010, 12:05 PM
> >> I keep getting told that the blacks
> >> are incapable of racism so ...
> >>
> >> ::michael
> >> On Nov 13, 2010 8:32 AM, "Pete Theisen"<[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Michael Oke, II wrote:
> >>>> Of course they will go after him. He is a
> true
> >> conservative that is
> >>>> attacking the core of the liberal base,
> also known
> >> as unions.
> >>>> Attempts to intimidate voters is not
> important to
> >> worry about, after all
> >>>> they were targeting those that didn't
> realize the
> >> mistake they were
> >> making
> >>>> in voting Republican.
> >>> Hi Michael,
> >>>
> >>> Well! Thank heaven it wasn't *racial* . . .
> >>>
> >>>> On Nov 13, 2010 8:05 AM, "Nicholas
> Geti"<[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> http://visiontoamerica.org/story/why-is-the-obama-justice-department-going-after-new-jerseys-popular-republican-governor.html
> >>>>> Why is the Obama Justice Department
> going
> >> after New Jersey's popular
> >>>> Republican governor?
> >>>>> The Justice Department under President
> Obama
> >> may be unwilling to
> >>>> investigate the New Black Panthers, but
> it's
> >> apparently intent on
> >>>> scrutinizing that other menace to society
> - New
> >> Jersey's upstart
> >> Republican
> >>>> governor Chris Christie.
> >>> <snip>
> >>>
> >>>>> How about Obama's $200M trip to India
> or
> >> Pelosi's private jet and
> >> $18,000
> >>>> per month apartment? This is really
> disgusting.
> >>> --
> >>> Regards,
> >>>
> >>> Pete
> >>> http://pete-theisen.com/
> >>> http://elect-pete-theisen.com[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to