On 11/13/2010 06:56 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: > When 97% of Blacks vote for Obama, it doesn't get any more racist than that.
Your statement is twisted. When used as an adjective, a racist might be defined as someone who is intolerant, or someone who makes racial remarks, or someone that discriminates, especially on the basis of race or religion, (eg anti-black, anti-Semitic types). When used as a noun, a racist is a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others, (eg racialist). The overwhelming support President Obama received from the African Americans had nothing to do with racism. The blacks voted for President Obama; because, they identified with him, they admired his courage in running for the hightest office in the land, they felt he was the candidate most likely to represent their best interest, and they felt he was the candidate best equipped to handle the critical issue created during the Bush Presidency, that needed immediate attention. Regards, LelandJ 2: discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion [syn: antiblack, anti-Semitic, anti-Semite(a)] n : a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others [syn: racialist] "Racist" > > > > > > --- On Sat, 11/13/10, Michael Oke, II<[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: Michael Oke, II<[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [OT] Obama's attorney general going after Cristi but ignores >> Black Panthers >> To: "ProFox Email List"<[email protected]> >> Date: Saturday, November 13, 2010, 12:05 PM >> I keep getting told that the blacks >> are incapable of racism so ... >> >> ::michael >> On Nov 13, 2010 8:32 AM, "Pete Theisen"<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Michael Oke, II wrote: >>>> Of course they will go after him. He is a true >> conservative that is >>>> attacking the core of the liberal base, also known >> as unions. >>>> Attempts to intimidate voters is not important to >> worry about, after all >>>> they were targeting those that didn't realize the >> mistake they were >> making >>>> in voting Republican. >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> Well! Thank heaven it wasn't *racial* . . . >>> >>>> On Nov 13, 2010 8:05 AM, "Nicholas Geti"<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> http://visiontoamerica.org/story/why-is-the-obama-justice-department-going-after-new-jerseys-popular-republican-governor.html >>>>> Why is the Obama Justice Department going >> after New Jersey's popular >>>> Republican governor? >>>>> The Justice Department under President Obama >> may be unwilling to >>>> investigate the New Black Panthers, but it's >> apparently intent on >>>> scrutinizing that other menace to society - New >> Jersey's upstart >> Republican >>>> governor Chris Christie. >>> <snip> >>> >>>>> How about Obama's $200M trip to India or >> Pelosi's private jet and >> $18,000 >>>> per month apartment? This is really disgusting. >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> Pete >>> http://pete-theisen.com/ >>> http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ >>> [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
