On 10/14/2010 12:29 PM, Lou Syracuse wrote:
> I have inherited an app that was written using the FFC.    I've never used
> the FFC - and after beating my head against the wall I now know why.   I
> can't even add a new form to the project without generating a string of
> errors when trying to save it - even if I haven't added any code or objects
> to it.   Same with copying an existing form.  I need to add 6 new forms and
> can't create them because of the framework.    And don't get me started on
> the default 'search' form.
>
>
>
> Anyway, just to take an informal poll. does anybody use the FFC?.   It would
> be good to know before I go into the Director's office and tell him that we
> need to re-write the program that someone took 1.5 years to write and
> implemented 2 weeks ago.    It is not that big a system; I am estimating it
> will take me about two  weeks to rewrite- but only if I decrease my coffee
> intake 50% and use one hand to type with.   Lol


Been there, done that, feel your pain.  The wizards and framework that 
came with VFP aren't to my liking, and like you, it was such a small 
project that I just rewrote it.  I *do* use some of the ffc's as defined 
in Markus Egger's Advanced OOP with VFP6 book, iirc.  Some of the 
classes are handy, but the framework and wizards sucked for a good 
developer, imo.

-- 
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
http://twitter.com/mbabcock16

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to