Pete Theisen wrote: >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11491937 >> >> OK ProFox, which one of you is responsible for this? 2 billion >> records sounds like a DBF limitation.
> I don't see any of their applications being written in FoxPro. It > wouldn't surprise me to find some M$ contamination in their stuff, however. Here we go: http://www.bi.com/statement_regarding_totalaccess_server_issue Len Silverston answering the questions, said: "very unusual" "not" "memory storage problems" “In my 28 years as a database management expert, running out of values in a column in a table is very rare and very difficult to reach,” he said. “To see this coming with what the designers had put in place would be very difficult.” Well, that seems to rule out FoxPro. Everybody knows about the DBF limit, if it were that it would not be difficult to foresee. Earlier in the article, Monica Hook admitted the M$ involvement, however. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
