Is any inheritance involved? Could the code be hiding in a parent lib or form?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Skelley <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:57:55 
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: VFP9 SP2: Losing Method Code

Lew:
It is truly lost! Seems to be lost on the compile because, for example, I 
worked on a click method to a button and saved it. Test it from the command 
window and al was good. Compiled the program to an EXE and sent it to the user. 
He ran it and the could click on the button to have it do zero. he called and I 
looked at the click method in the SCX and it was empty. I ran the EXE and as 
expected it had no code to execute. As a side note in VFP8 I would lose my user 
defined methods as well.
This is nuts! And now I want to convert a VFP6 app with 195 forms to VFP9 with 
countless objects on the forms with countless user defined methods. I may go 
nuts...
Regards,

Jack

________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Lew [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:07 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VFP9 SP2: Losing Method Code

Have you opened the scx/vcx as a table & looked through all the cols, even 
deleted ones, to make sure the code is truly lost?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Skelley <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 09:37:05
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
Subject: VFP9 SP2: Losing Method Code

Good Morning All:
Ok so what am I doing wrong? I moved one of my apps from VFP8 to VFP9 SP2 and 
like in VFP8 I am losing method code on the objects. For example, the click 
event on a button.
I had this issue in 8 and couldn't stop it, so the consensus here was move it 
to 9. So I did. But it is only slightly better.
I have a habit of using ctrl W to close a method and the form when done with 
it. Is this my issue? Does anyone one else here have similar issues? In VFP6 
have never lost a line of code much less full methods. Should I be using the 
save menu pad instead?
I am crazed with this and have zero confidence with the code saving. From what 
I can tell the method code is lost in the scx field but the objcode remains. Is 
this an issue with the sct file?
Any insight would be helpful at this point.
Thanks!
Regards,

Jack Skelley
<a href="http://devils.nhl.com/";><IMG 
SRC=http://c1.newjerseydevils.com/sig/[email protected]
 border="0" usemap="#Map"></a>
<map name="Map">
  <area shape="rect" coords="4,67,203,85" 
href="http://devils.nhl.com/club/page.htm?id=62715"; target="_blank">
  <area shape="rect" coords="269,67,346,87" href="http://www.prucenter.com/"; 
target="_blank">
  <area shape="rect" coords="243,43,264,62" 
href="http://www.youtube.com/prudentialcenter"; target="_blank">
  <area shape="rect" coords="223,43,244,62" href="http://twitter.com/nhldevils"; 
target="_blank"><area shape="rect" coords="203,43,224,62" 
href="http://www.facebook.com/NewJerseyDevils?ref=ts"; target="_blank">
</map>
</A>


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0b957900b2b8194d998a441195b66038390bf9c...@drdsrv03.drdad.thenewarkarena.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Report [OT] Abuse: 
http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/0b957900b2b8194d998a441195b66038390bf9c...@drdsrv03.drdad.thenewarkarena.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1046239703-1286553951-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2517717...@bda817.bisx.prod.on.blackberry
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to