Pete Theisen wrote:
> Pete Theisen wrote:
> 
>>> http://tinyurl.com/2eyrbhc
>>>
>>> Greene is out on bond for having shown dirty pics to a female college 
>>> student and suggesting that they go to her dorm room. Was she under 18, 
>>> if not, what's the beef? Reports don't say.
>>>
>>> http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/sc_dem_senate_candidate_recently_charged_with_show.php
>>>
>>> Sounds like a fine D nominee to me! Just what everyone expects!
>> OK, the woman was 19 BUT she didn't know Greene, he just sat next to her 
>> in the computer lab and tried to pick her up. Incidental to his pickup 
>> line he called up some porn on his screen and asked her to look at it. 
>> That is *way* creepy, but is it a felony or even an offense at all?
>>
>> What kind of "porn" can you even get in a university computer lab?
>>
>> http://www.wltx.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=88430
>>
>> He was arrested, but no indictment has been returned in over 8 months. 
>> With all this publicity he will never get a fair trial even if they do 
>> indict him.
>>
>> They may nail him for falsifying his financial statements to get a 
>> public defender. Presuming that $10,400 in savings would disqualify him 
>> from that protection.
> 
> Good video interview:
> 
> http://www.wltx.com/news/story.aspx?storyid=88430

The girl's side of the story:

http://storyballoon.org/shep-smith-talks-to-the-woman-who-says-sc-dem-sen-nom-alvin-green-showed-her-porn/
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to