On Jun 2, 2010, at 12:05 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
> There's got to be some legacy support.
No, there doesn't. That's the point.
> Makes you wonder how thin/trim
> VFP would be today if it only supported back to say VFP8.
Really? How much VFP 9 work do you do that needs to support @SAY/GET?
VFP should have done this when it made the jump from 2.x to 3.0. Instead, they
simply layered the OO stuff on top of the existing 2.x code.
Fox 2.x will continue to run on systems of that era. Imagine if Fox
could have dumped that baggage and evolved to take advantage of improvements in
hardware and the OS.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
