What is misleading about it ? I never referred to it as a TEST. I acknowledged the differences and made the point that previous install was 2 years ago In subsequent posts I made the point I was NOT referring to the OS even.
S On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Steve Ellenoff <sellen...@pinmame.com> wrote: > > Your test is misleading. Take the same 80 gig hd, put a fresh copy of > XP on there, and then compare the speed. > After two years of accumulated crap, windows will no doubt run far > slower than when first installed. > > I remember reading somewhere that a test was done on the same > hardware, and XP booted faster than Win7, Win7 booted faster than Vista. > > At 12:53 AM 01/26/2010, you wrote: > >A client brought in a 2 year old vaio laptop > > >From cold boot to wordpad doc, 5 minutes > > > >Replaced the hard drive (80 gig ssd), installed Windows 7 > > > > >From cold boot to wordpad doc, 23 secs. > >That included 9 secs for Bios start up > > > >Yeah ok, no other software installed yet (AV etc) > > > >I want one, NOW > > > >-- > >Regards > >Sytze de Boer > >Kiss Systems > >Hamilton, NZ > >Ph: 64-7-8391670, Mob:64 21 937611 > >URL: www.kiss.co.nz > > > > > >--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > >multipart/alternative > > text/plain (text body -- kept) > > text/html > >--- > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/367498c41002011146t346a5462sd4e6ba8df9424...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
