Publius Maximus wrote: > And the last part of that link is very critical to understand:
Hi Bob, > Update: I just talked to a source on Capitol Hill who wants to make > sure everyone understands the mechanics of the issue. The bill sets > up a supermajority threshold of 67 votes to bring accountability to > IMAB decisions, and the rule on being in or out of order can get > waived at 60 votes. However, as this battle shows, even getting to 60 > is almost an impossibility, let alone 67. Clearly Reid wants to put > accountability out of reach with these radical propositions. Back in the bad old days, the Nazis called people like me "useless eaters". Of course, the exterminations were more direct. But they have ways of getting you just as dead here today. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
