Based on my understanding of the video you provided, regarding Senator Jim Demint's, (R), objection, the legislation would not change parliamentary rule. It is a parliamentary procedure, and such clause are very common in Senate and House legislation.
Of course, if there were any challenges in the future regarding the matter, it would be up to the Supreme Court to rule whether the procedure violated the constitution or no. If the Supreme Court ruled the procedure was a parliamentary rule change, or the procedure was unconstitutional, the clause would be stricken, and have no effect as law. Don't ask me the difference between a parliamentary rule change and a procedural clause, as I haven't a clue. Regards, LelandJ On 12/22/2009 10:42 AM, Publius Maximus wrote: > http://bit.ly/52i1OA > > - - - > Now this will piss you off. Apparently hidden inside the Senate > version of ObamaCare is a provision that ensures that any future > Congress can not change or repeal this monstrosity: > > "...there’s one provision that i found particularly troubling and it’s > under section c, titled “limitations on changes to this subsection.” > and i quote — “it shall not be in order in the senate or the house of > representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or > conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this > subsection.” > - - - > > This explains why they're giving away the farm to bribe that magic #60. > > It's so wrong, on so many levels, I don't even know how to express my outrage. > > - Publius > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
