Ted, > Note I wrote about his paper 30 months ago at: > http://leafe.com/archives/showMsg/338586
I'm missed your original post. Thanks for the link to his earlier paper. Appears we had a similar reaction to Dr. Stonebraker's work, right down to the identical 'interesting reading'. Malcolm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
