On Fri, 05 Jun 2009 08:07 -0500, "Stephen Russell" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought it was a simple as the base data storage being the biggest > hurdle. The dbf is unsecure. Very bad in today's mindset. > The dbf has a file size limit. I would assume that any reasoned approach to this would be at the very least enabling the transparent use of a couple of different database engines - SQLite, PostgresSQL, MySQL and MSSQL would be the ones I'd go with. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
