On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Alan Bourke <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 15:31 +0100, "Dave Crozier" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> My only comment is that if a small company like eTecnologia can come up >> with >> the goods then why oh why couldn't M$, but lets not flog that old donkey >> to >> death again! > > > No, lets! > > Firstly have they come up with anything usable in the real world yet? > Secondly, there's nothing in it for M$ to do a CLR version of VFP. > -- -----------------------------------
There you go poking a stick into the flesh wound again. Why would M$ avoid VFP porting to the CLR is probably a better Q. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Web and Windows Development Independent Contractor Memphis TN 901.246-0159 _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
