Yep, that will be the problem. I would buy a cheap dell laptop with the appropriate video capability.
--- On Mon, 3/30/09, Joe Yoder <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Joe Yoder <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [NF] Dual display control options > To: [email protected] > Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 2:45 PM > We actually have several laptops that > could nicely retire for that > purpose. The only problem is that they don't support > the full screen > resolution of 1920x1200. - Joe > > On Monday, March 30, 2009 2:10 PM, Stephen Russell > wrote: > > > >Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:10:18 -0500 > >From: Stephen Russell > >To: [email protected] > >cc: > >Subject: Re: [NF] Dual display control options > > > >On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Joe Yoder <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks to each one who responded. You are all > suggesting a second PC > >> which we have plenty of. It's really more a > question of finding the > >> space to locate the PC. If we could use the > receptionist's machine the > >> space problem would be solved. > >> > >> I had hoped someone would know about a way to > drive a video card remotely > >> from a terminal services session or an application > that uses two > >> separate video cards in the same PC for this > purpose. It is probably > >> better to figure out a place to locate a second PC > and figure out a way > >> to have staff power it on and off as appropriate. > >------------------------------ > > > >Would a laptop fill the bill? Just mount that > with the lid open under a desk? > > > >-- > >Stephen Russell > >Sr. Production Systems Programmer > >Web and Windows Development > >Independent Contractor > >Memphis TN > > > >901.246-0159 > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
