Protectionism doesn't work, however, placing equal tariffs on incoming goods as 
our goods get put on our exports only seems fair.

************************************************* 
1/20/2013 Eviction Notice

http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336


--- On Fri, 3/6/09, Ken Kixmoeller/fh <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> From: Ken Kixmoeller/fh <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OT] Australia on brink of recession
> To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
> Date: Friday, March 6, 2009, 4:56 PM
> On Mar 6, 2009, at 3:22 PM, MB Software Solutions General
> Account wrote:
> 
> > Protectionism is NOT a dirty word.
> 
> No, it is a short-sighted, proven-failure policy.
> International  
> equivalent of a 2-year-old covering his ears and yelling
> "I don't  
> hear you!"
> 
> Sorry, Michael -- history proves you wrong on this.
> 
> Ken
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/aad64c03-b05a-4152-a942-2ca5d38b8...@information-architecture.com
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to