Well I grant that that here in Oz we don't exactly get a word-by-word
coverage of his every movement. But if you can show me some examples of that
without the attendant hysterical commentary for me to judge objectively I
will take a look at it. I just have serious doubt that anyone (except the
loons that are out and about) would be seriously treating Obama as a god or
divine. The Great Hope maybe - but that's altogether different.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Michael Oke, II
Sent: Thursday, 19 February 2009 2:20 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Federal Obligations Exceed World GDP

Geoff,
Your comments below highlight that you haven't paid any attention to the 
worship that has been lavished on Obama by his fans here in the States. 
  There is usually a god-like slant to their comments and beliefs about 
him.  Try looking up false prophets to get you started on where that 
will lead them.

::michael

Geoff Flight wrote:
> it would be fine if you actually did that. But you don't. your beliefs and
> comments about Obama are absurd. Describing him as an anti-christ is
> ridiculous, saying that he is an object or worship is even more ridiculous
-
> unless you use the lowest common denominator definition of the term. But
in
> Christian circles (from where I believe you comments flow) worship is
always
> used in the DIVINE ie putting someone in the place of God. That is not
> happening.
> 


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to