< What's unbalanced about agreeing with you that regulation in principle isn't bad? What's unbalanced about agreeing both parties over the last 40 years are to blame -- a position I've held since before you joined this list. What's unbalanced (for a Christian) about seeing spiritual influences in political goings-on? What's unbalanced about reading Obama's own books critically, or exploring the implications of his life circumstances and choices? What's unbalanced about thinking through the implications of things, and trying to make sense of the big picture in non-conventional ways?>
it would be fine if you actually did that. But you don't. your beliefs and comments about Obama are absurd. Describing him as an anti-christ is ridiculous, saying that he is an object or worship is even more ridiculous - unless you use the lowest common denominator definition of the term. But in Christian circles (from where I believe you comments flow) worship is always used in the DIVINE ie putting someone in the place of God. That is not happening. I'm happy to debate; in fact I love it. But if you want to bungee jump into the abyss of illogic then I will mock you. Just use a sense of balance and one other hint. Keep it short. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bob Calco Sent: Monday, 16 February 2009 3:40 PM To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] Federal Obligations Exceed World GDP > < I don't mind a little mental bungee jumping from time to time, it > helps > clear the cobwebs and is always a leap of faith that new understanding > is at > the bottom and the tether of honesty will keep you from smashing your > head > against it.> > > That is an illogical absurdity. I agree about your mental bungee > jumping but > please don't equate what happens next as some kind of refreshing vision > and > honesty. Your bungee jumping takes you right 'off the edge' and into > the > abyss of imbalance and absurdity. I can respect you, but not respect > your > comments. Geoff you don't respect anything but the sound of your own voice pronouncing other people absurd, insane, looney, etc. > I don't believe that your comments reflect even a dose of > balance > or logic. That's because you refuse to understand what they are. You hear only caricatures of your own invention that are easy for you to poke fun at, and never really take in the full view I try to share with you. > You don't make leaps of faith - you usually just make leaps. > And > they take you nowhere but error. I love to debate with opposing points > of > view. But it is essential that both sides take a common view of facts, > balance and logic. 'Bungee jumps' aren't part of the deal. What's unbalanced about agreeing with you that regulation in principle isn't bad? What's unbalanced about agreeing both parties over the last 40 years are to blame -- a position I've held since before you joined this list. What's unbalanced (for a Christian) about seeing spiritual influences in political goings-on? What's unbalanced about reading Obama's own books critically, or exploring the implications of his life circumstances and choices? What's unbalanced about thinking through the implications of things, and trying to make sense of the big picture in non-conventional ways? You never refute points, arguments or facts, you just like make grand pronunciamentos about what "everyone" whom you claim is "normal" thinks, as if you're some arbiter of all that is logical and common sensical. - Bob [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
