So, you are saying I would actually use ReFox to Encrypt the APP file before distributing it to the clients? And, this is how we would stop people from looking at our code? I know about ReFox, and I have used it in the past (although not for this purpose of encrypting) - and I think they even have ReFox here at my job. But, not sure if they would be thrilled to use it to do encryption for EVERY time they deploy an update. But, it IS something to think about...
-K- -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kurt, I was not aware that an APP differed from an EXE in that respect. You can ReFox either, no? Can you still see an APP's code even if you tick the 'Encrypt' checkbox? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt Wendt Henry - there is still the downside to the APP's idea, which is that the code is still too easily accessible by clients - unlike a compiled EXE or DLL. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Kurt, I don't see why you wouldn't split into several APPs called from one central EXE. No FLL or DLL required for splitting. Certainly no registry stuff either... _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
