It's unethical because these girls have mostly been sexually or emotionally abused. I would be OK doing a bikini, lingerie, or classic nudes websire, but girls sitting on traffic cones makes me queasy.
Another friend of mine worked for a porno site that featured live girls on camera. He said the girls would come in with black eyes, would be high as a kite, would be driven to work by their 40yo "boyfriends", and were as dumb as dirt. He got so sick of the scene that he quit the business. The receptionist was told to answer the phone "Office" so that the girls could get a message from their mom or dad without revealing the nature of their work. This was pre-cheap-cellphone days. We all make choices in our lives. I'm sure ethical behavior has cost me a ton of money over the years, but that's my own choice. --- On Thu, 9/25/08, MB Software Solutions General Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: MB Software Solutions General Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [NF] Clients naming their own terms... > To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, September 25, 2008, 5:52 PM > Michael Madigan wrote: > > I'm telling you Vince, If I had pro-Obama stuff or > pornography, I would > be making money hand-over-fist. It sucks to be ethical. > > > > I know this guy who is making $86,000 a month with his > on-line porno > business. That's net, not gross. That's more a > month than I make a > year. > > > Is porn unethical if the models are all of legal age and > consent? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are > the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or > medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for > those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
