Gil Hale wrote: > My gut tells me the EULA additive restrictions would not hold up in court, > eventually. But who wants to take on the expense involved in proving that > point? Not me. ive with what we have, update and be more restricted, or > defy the restirctions and do what we want anyway (come get me, I am running > VFP under Linux/WINE/CrossoverOffice!...). It would be costly for M$ to > chase someone like me down, no margin in it. Bullies will be bullies...
It wouldn't hold up in court. You'd get a ton of new supporters behind you, ready to fight the good fight. Go get 'em, Gil! <g> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
