My gut tells me the EULA additive restrictions would not hold up in court, eventually. But who wants to take on the expense involved in proving that point? Not me. ive with what we have, update and be more restricted, or defy the restirctions and do what we want anyway (come get me, I am running VFP under Linux/WINE/CrossoverOffice!...). It would be costly for M$ to chase someone like me down, no margin in it. Bullies will be bullies...
Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete Theisen > Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:12 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Microsoft Commercials > > > Pete Theisen wrote: > > Gil Hale wrote: > > > >> On the bright side, I can still deploy compiled VFP apps > without paying any > >> additional fees to M$ <g>... > > > > Hi Gil! > > > > They can change that any time they want by slipping a new EULA > in with a > > security update. They have already done this. > > When they did it: > > http://leafe.com/archives/showMsg/138654 > > -- > Regards, > > Pete > http://pete-theisen.com/ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
