Joe, try setting the starting address for DCHP on your router at 100 and
limit the number of addresses to what you need for the laptops/notebooks + 1
for guest system.  Then you can use static IPs for all the other systems on
the network as long as you keep the addresses below 100.  I use this method
at my home (6 systems) and at work (145 systems).

Also set your DNS addresses at the systems WIN2003 as 1st, Router as Second,
3rd as Internet provider's DNS and 4th a Public DNS Server.  When your
mobile users are in the office they will get their IP from the router, their
DNS Info from the WIN 2003 box if it is up, the Router next, etc. When the
mobile users are out of the office if can find d DCHP server it may or may
no act as a DNS server, but it does matter because you have give their
systems a place to find a DNS server.

Even you are in a company that issues IP's but won't pass or share DNS data
to limit internet access you users should be able to get to and use the
internet.

Jim 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Joe Yoder
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 1:12 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [NF] Small LAN configuration for failsafe DNS

I am running Server 2003 on a small LAN of about 10 machines. Internet
access is via cable modem connected through a router to all machines.  I
need to have the machines use the DNS server in the 2003 box while that box
is functional.  If the 2003 box is down, the router should handle the DNS.
 
My current router's DHCP server has no setting to control the Preferred or
Alternate DNS server values it distributes.  Does someone know of a router
with a built in DHCP server that does support those settings?
 
I expect there would be a way to setup a Linux box to do the job but I would
prefer avoiding adding any equipment with rotating parts.  
 
Another possibility would be to have two DHCP servers (router and 2003) with
non overlapping ranges.  Is there a way to ensure that the 2003 one would
always win when it is running?  Might a switch between the router and the
rest of the LAN add enough delay to have 2003 get there first?
 
TIA for any input,
 
Joe
 


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to