[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Although you evidentially don't appreciate the news and Op Ed opinions >> published by the Washington Post and the New York Times, be thankful >> tonight that you live in a country where you have access to more than >> one side of the story; because, in many countries you would never hear >> anything other than the one approved point of view. >> > > True, but you say the same about FoxNews? We are fortunate in this digital > age that we are not dependent upon the Times, Post and the three networks for > our news. There are many other sources through which the truth can come out, > even if they try to squelch it. A recent case in point was the Breck Girl's > affair. The mainstream press ignored it and it took the Enquirer to break > the story. The point is not that the story itself was that important, but > that it was censored by the mainstream media and the public would not have > known about it without the efforts of a scandal sheet. Please keep in mind > there is more than one source of censorship. >
Yes, and we have the internet that is as of now still protected under our freedom of speech guarantees, at least for the most part. Regards, LelandJ > > -- > Larry Miller > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/mixed > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > message/rfc822 > --- > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
