Yeah, well you're 100% right.  That's why lawyers send mail certified to 
confirm receipt.

As soon as they cut my final check I'm opening a bottle of champagne!


--- On Tue, 8/12/08, Matthew Jarvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Matthew Jarvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [NF] Spam Filter Blues
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 11:55 PM
> <snip>>
> > Moral of the story, look in your spam folders.
> >
> 
> Wrong - get smarter freekin' clients....
> 
> To take, or threaten to take, legal action against someone
> because they
> haven't responded to an email(s) is just plain
> stupid....
> 
> There are sooooooooooo many things that can go wrong with
> email, spam
> filters being just one, it's completely silly to base
> biz decisions on
> it...
> 
> mj
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to