Michael Madigan wrote:
> If you look at the protests all over the country against Savage, you
will realize that they were printed with the same fonts and the same
styles.  The attack was coordinated by the Democrats to try to get a
conservative commentator off the air.
>
> It also comes down to freedom of speech.  Why shouldn't someone be able
to question Autism and its treatment?  Are we going to go back to a time
when we couldn't question whether the world was flat, the earth was the
center of the universe, or anything else that we now know is false?
>
> Savage says stuff to get attention, but the essence of his argument is
correct, that  Attention Deficit Disorder and Autism are both way over
diagnosed and over-medicated.

Accountability.  What he said was way beyond what could be argued.  He
should be held responsible for his comments and the ensuing action
appropriate.

>
> That being said, I think that the rise in Autism is caused by something
in the food supply.  The symptoms of autism are similar to systematic
yeast infections which has been linked to IBS and fibromyalgia.  I
suspect it probably has to do high levels of sugar in the diet, along 
with mercury and heavy-metal toxins, pesticides, and anything else that
weakens the immune system.

I'm not sure what it is, but my nephew has Asperbergers (sp?), which is
a form of autism, iirc.  Likewise, my daughter could just be a regular
teenager, but I think that she exhibits very high level/functioning
traces of autism at times too.





_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to