On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Paul Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Russell wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:18 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> What version introduced the SEEK(value,table,index) function? Just > >> curious as to why these devs (long ago) had not used that SEEK() > >> function but instead did all this SET ORDER TO....SEEK value stuff. > Not > >> that there's anything wrong with it...I'm just curious as to when it > was > >> introduced. > >> > >> > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > Was it in FP1, or did it come out in 2.0? > > > > I think it was 1. > > The third parameter was definitely not supported in 2.0 or 2.5 ... > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That is why I thought it was version 1. Remember when every index was it's own file? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
