I write a spec initially which then becomes the user manual with a bit of editing then offer them the choice - extensive testing at extra cost or accept it as it is with a promise that I'll fix any bugs where it doesn't work as in the manual. Any changes they pay extra. I've never had any problem so far.
John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MB Software Solutions > Sent: 05 November 2007 20:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [NF] User Acceptance Testing > > > Curious as to how many of you independents handle UAT (User Acceptance > Testing), whereby you are getting them to sign off on delivery of the > goods (software) and their acceptance of said software. > > ??? > > (I thought I had asked this earlier but a search of the ProFox archives > turned up nothing.) > > tia! > --Michael > > -- > Michael J. Babcock, MCP > MB Software Solutions, LLC > http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com > http://fabmate.com > "Work smarter, not harder, with MBSS custom software solutions!" > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
