On 10/24/07, Mike yearwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> There is also "too much of a good thing" and "the kid in the candy
> store". There's no standardization with the confusion of all these
> choices. That alone is costing businesses plenty. Not too mention
> retooling every few years.
>
> Mike
>

Well, yes and no. There are kids and candy stores, and we learn
moderation, one way ot the other. There are too may car brands to
choose from, two many TV resolutions, but civilization manages to get
by. There is a great essay on the "Paradox of Choice" I encourage
everyone to read. It is true that many choices make things more
difficult at times. I know I struggle when trying to pick the
"optimal" new printer or laptop or networking technologies. It's
"easier" if you only have one choice, even if it is mediocre. But
there's a price to pay for mediocrity, too.

As far as standardization, I would say that the Free World is more
interested in sticking with _real_ standards (http, html, OpenDoc,
SGML, etc.) and not trying to "lock in" their customer base with
proprietary extensions.

Retooling every year has multiple aspects: hardware and software keep
evolving, and we need to keep up. So, multiple-core CPUs and
virtualization will be driving factors in getting new hardware.
Aspect-Oriented Programming and some of the advances in software
development means we can write better, faster, more efficient systems
in newer languages; few of us want to code in FoxBase any more. So,
these are the good aspects of retooling. The bad aspects are when a
vendor of a proprietary technology decides to orphan its customers,
whether that's Paradox or Multimate or Windows 2000 or FoxPro. That's
lost money.

-- 
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to