Just knocked up a quick proof of concept using collections and it works fine so 
I will progress with this as a solution and probably put a front end 
pre-processing method onto the class to convert the array into a collection 
before it is passed. 

The NICE thing about collections is that they can  be manipulated as true 
objects which obviously CANNOT be said of arrays which constantly want VFP to 
think they only have one element in them when it comes to passing objects 
around.. 

Thanks for the help guys..... It is just annoying that you have the seemingly 
simple solution in hand only to be thwarted by the historical Quirks of pre-OOP 
language development. 

Dave (Still learning ... ( ;-p )

-----Original Message-----
From: ProFox [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: 24 November 2015 14:12
To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Array passing Suggestions...

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Alan Bourke <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2015, at 01:33 PM, Dave Crozier wrote:
>
> > I am just going around in circles here at the moment and beginning 
> > to think that I have missed something really basic.
>
> Yep, Collections. :)
> -----------------


Exactly what I was thinking.

--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to