Hello Fernando,

No - I don't have a Tab labeled "Servers" in the Proj Mgr - only All, Data, 
Documents, Classes, Code and Other. 

As for your other comment. So - yes, this app I am working on - it does Office 
Automation. But, you're saying that Other External Apps could call my VFP App 
via Automation. Interesting. But, no - in this case - there is no need for 
that. As such, then I assume its OK to delete those VBR & TLB files - since 
there is no need for some External app to call my VFP app.

Thanks again,
-K-

-----Original Message-----
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Fernando D. 
Bozzo
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 11:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: VBR & TLB Files Generated by VFP!

Hi Kurt :

Really it is not important if your app uses automation for external objects, as 
office or something else, the good answer is what VFP guy said, that this files 
are created only when you have one or more Ole public classes in your app (for 
allowing automation from the outside, in example) You can check if your project 
have this classes looking at the servers tab on your pjx project file.
El 20/10/2015 4:36 p. m., "Kurt Wendt" <[email protected]> escribió:

> So - today at work when I compiled this app - I noticed that VFP was 
> generating these files w/VBR & TLB extensions. I was Quite surprised 
> by this - as I don't remember seeing these files before. And, I did a 
> Google search - but, some of the results were confusing and seemingly 
> conflicting
> - such as this one programmer forum where a person asked:
>     "BUILD EXE why no .vbr and .tlb files?"
>
> ...and one response they got was:
>     "You're thinking of VB. Make sure you are connected to the correct 
> Help. VFP does not use those extensions. "
>
> While another person responded:
>      "VFP will only create those extensions for an .EXE if you have an 
> OLEPublic class in your project.  "
>
> I know there is some Office Automation in this App having to do with 
> Excel files - and maybe THAT is why these files are generated. Am I right?
>
>
> Regards,
> Kurt Wendt
> Consultant
>
> GLOBETAX
> 90 Broad Street
> New York, NY 10004-2205, U.S.A.
> Tel. +1-212-747-9100
> Fax. +1-212-747-0029
> Email:  [email protected]
> Web: www.GlobeTax.com
>
> GlobeTax does not provide or offer, and this is not, tax, investment 
> or legal advice. This email and any attachments hereto is intended 
> only for use by the addressee(s) and may contain confidential 
> information. If you are not the intended recipient  of this  e-mail, 
> please immediately notify the sender at +1-212-747-9100 and 
> permanently delete the original and any copies of this e-mail.
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGQ_JumrjJJ0-qhgmmCzvryFe=pk1ofvr+cnspo4r9pzrs1...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Report [OT] Abuse: 
http://leafe.com/reportAbuse/CAGQ_JumrjJJ0-qhgmmCzvryFe=pk1ofvr+cnspo4r9pzrs1...@mail.gmail.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f24c...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to