On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Jeff Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have several customers using virtual servers with varied results. What I
> am looking for (for a customer) is a virtual windows server that will
> support 100 users in 30 states.  They are using West Wind Web Connection
> for access from the remote states.  They have my desktop application
> working in the home office in Tennessee with about 25 users (included in
> the 100).
>
> Many of the server companies have not allowed me to access the system
> remotely.  I have to send them instructions on what to do and they rarely
> do it correctly.
>
---------------------------

Consider the cloud?  Well probably won't work in a cloud environment.
Other option is to consider buying your own server and hosting it where you
want, PHX or some other town if you can get it cheaper after freight.
Rackspace may be just the perfect fit for you to rent a machine from.

Another idea is to revamp the application to one that will be cloud capable
going forward.  Granted that is a rewrite but sounds like one that might be
a good business decision if you ever consider selling your business for
retirement.  Nobody will buy a fixer upper in the IT space.   Just a
thought.


-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN

901.246-0159 cell


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYJKdZgdZ=ze3neY=pUgMyb-6QB-95oStuCPDYT1DF=s...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to