Ken, Sorry to hear of all your problems. Not sure if I myself am on the "A-List".
My suggestion - when I see that something might be amiss - I contact Ed directly via e-mail. And, he is Always responsive and willing to help out. He may simply be busy and not always reading all the e-mails from the Forum here. But, I assure you - if you e-mail him directly - you should be able to get a reply and follow-up. Just a thought... -K- -----Original Message----- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Dibble Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 11:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Mail issues, was "Test" At 11:33 AM 7/9/2015 -0400, you wrote: >Email is not an instantaneous medium, despite the fact that some of it >shows up right away. Yes, I know, but I have had several problems with Profox over the past month or so and I keep complaining about them and nothing gets done. And my experience has been that usually, if something I send to Profox doesn't show up within a few minutes, it never does. That's not 100%, but it's around 90%. In one recent case I mentioned that I never received the original message to which several replies were received. This complaint was ignored even though a second poster reported the same issue with that message. >Sometimes things get stuck in routing and they take days. Ed is using >some hosted servers, mailing list software, and a few custom scripts to >process all of the mail, sort it into a couple of buckets and send it >out, relayed through a few other mail servers. >Lots of places for stuff to get stuck. > >I found your second message on the "[NF] Can't Access Specific Website" >or perhaps the third, in my Spam folder, with a header indicating >Google did not like the format. The third message only inquired about the first two. The first two were much longer, containing some tracert data and some text. I use Roadrunner for email. Just because of issues like this, I have it set to deliver all messages unmolested. >I went to the Leafe forum archives, but only see the TEST thread. I realize this is a free service and complex and so forth. I also realize that I am not in the "A list" around here due to my possibly "eccentric" views on things. Still... after several complaints something should be done, IMO. If I seem frustrated, it's because I am. No mean-ness is intended, though. >On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ken Dibble <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, more anomalies with Profox and me, apparently. > > > > At 10:49 AM and again at 10:57 AM EDT today, I sent a message with > > the subject line: "[NF] Can't Access Specific Website" to profox. > > Neither of them arrived in my inbox. > > > > So at 10:59 AM EDT today, I sent a message with the same subject > > line but with entirely different content, asking if anybody had seen > > either of the two previous messages. > > > > That third message did not arrive promptly in my in box, so I sent > > the test message. Shortly thereafter, the third message did arrive, at > > least for me. > > However, I have seen two responses to my "TEST" message but so far > > no one has responded to the inquiry about the previous messages. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Ken > > > >> test what? > >> > >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Ken Dibble <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > test > >> > > >> > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/80838f1ca795b14ea1af48659f35166f1cc...@drexch02.corp.globetax.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
