On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:55 AM, AndyHC <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I thought ms were committed to /critical/ updates for unsupported > software, makes sense - just the cost of defending a shower of class action > suits would justify it. > > ----------------- > Not sure how to reply to that. Why should Windows 2000 have patches? Wouldn't it need a lot more recrafting the kernel? so patch XP, 7, 8 and when they release 9 drop XP ? -- Stephen Russell Sr. Analyst Ring Container Technology Oakland TN 901.246-0159 cell --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAJidMYKNHv4zZGMkx4BONdS7uT3OR6-quVmS0BE8cMM=cva...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
