I thought ms were committed to /critical/ updates for unsupported
software, makes sense - just the cost of defending a shower of class
action suits would justify it.
On 15/10/2013 19:49, Alan Bourke wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013, at 02:59 PM, Allen wrote:
As for 7, I think many businesses are remaining in XP. After all who
needs
M$ support.
It's not direct support that's the problem - it's having machines on the
internet without critical security holes being fixed. What Microsoft are
patching in 7 and 8 will give clues as to what to attack in XP. It's not
going to be pretty IMO.
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
