At 11:44 2013-05-01, Paul McNett <[email protected]> wrote:

[snip]

I think I'd run the app in a virtual machine running DOS or whatever OS the original
application targeted.

     The utilities run in 16-bit DOS.

I have run them under DOSBox successfully, except for the one that prints as DOSBox does not natively print.

One of my utilities is a file search program. A typical run takes 13-14 seconds on my XP desktop system. On my faster laptop, but having to be under DOSBox, it takes just over 3 1/2 minutes.

The utility is useful to me because it has some VFP awareness. Within broad limits, it will recognise classes and methods/procedures. It is quite helpful to me to know which methods a string occurs in.

The slowness breaks my workflow. I am accustomed to checking code prior to change by running several searches. At seconds, it is easy. At 3 1/2 minutes each, it discourages using it.

I suppose at some point that I will bite the bullet and try an emulator. Based on previous experience, I think I will probably get better speed than DOSBox, but worse than on my XP box.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to