At 18:05 2013-04-25, Ken Dibble <[email protected]> wrote:

If I want to have a form inside of another form's validation and set focus in the second form, I can not do so. Apparently, using LostFocus is a solution for this. I experimented a bit but then had to do something else.

I gave up messing with all this and just went with what you would probably call "front-end row validation".

I prefer to have field-level validation. Obviously, our values differ some in this area. We can both be right.

I don't use grids for data entry. It's too easy for users to edit the wrong row. They start working on row 3 and as their eyes move from left to right they slip down to row 4 and now you have a real problem.

Well, I am not going to use grids for DE so much as for data adjustment. The editing process that I described requires having to be able to deal with more than one row at a time.

I use multi-column picklists to let users choose a record to edit. (Actually, I have a homemade "list control" class that is a lot nicer than a list control and a lot easier to use than a grid.)

If I tried a picklist, my boss -- who does the invoicing -- would very shortly tell me to put it back the way it was. We need something easy to use.

In this case, someone who is quite comfortable with invoicing and how the data fits together would using the grids. The DE people would not be using them.

     There is more than one way to design a usable UI.

[snip]

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to