Nicholas Geti wrote:
> Hah. You said it not me.
> 
> Anyway, read the NYT article. Notice he starts frothing at the mouth 
> whenever he talks about sexual issues and the 1960's. In any case I am for 
> abortion and don't give a wit whether someone is gay or not. They have never 
> interfered with me so I leave them alone.

Hi Nicholas,

Have you ever met the man, or are you content to draw your conclusions 
of the man's character from the always unbiased NYT? While it isn't 
quite lock-step, being for abortion and not giving a wit about gay since 
they always left YOU alone, well, you MIGHT be an atheist.

>> Nicholas Geti wrote:
>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/03/opinion/blow-santorum-and-the-sexual-revolution.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha212
>>>
>>>
>>> He is really hung up on sexual issues. I think he needs to get some
>>> counseling and an attitude adjustment. This is why is doesn't appeal
>>> to the women vote. Certainly my wife can't stand him.
>> Hi Nicholas,
>>
>> If being against abortion and gay "marriage" is in any way "hung-up"
>> then you are recommending counseling for me as well.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[email protected]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to