Have you no sight?
----- Original Message ----- From: lelandj <lela...@mail.smvfp.com> To: ProFox Email List <profox@leafe.com> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 5:57 PM Subject: Re: [OT] good news if true On 02/01/2012 04:47 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: > They are one and the same Have you no shame? Regards, LelandJ > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: lelandj<lela...@mail.smvfp.com> > To: ProFox Email List<profox@leafe.com> > Cc: > Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 5:38 PM > Subject: Re: [OT] good news if true > > On 02/01/2012 04:22 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: >> Sasquatch Michelle Obama better get all her spending and vacations in before >> they take back her credit card. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: lelandj<lela...@mail.smvfp.com> >> To: ProFox Email List<profox@leafe.com> >> Cc: >> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 4:57 PM >> Subject: Re: [OT] good news if true >> >> On 02/01/2012 03:21 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: >>> Gallup is trash now. >> I wouldn't pay much attention to this poll. The 2012 election is coming >> on the heals of the Great Recession of 2007-2009. The greed of Wall >> Street, previous political administrations, the real estate markets, and >> financial institutions drove the American economy into the ground. Many >> people have been cleaned out by the greedy bastards, losing there >> saving, retirement funds, college fund, homes, and some have lost >> everything. While the American people suffered, they were asked to save >> those who wronged them. >> >> President Obama has been attacked by a predominately Republican congress >> that uses passive-aggressive tactic to blacken his eye buy defeating all >> legislation aimed at giving the Aerican people a win against the >> recession and it aftermath. >> >> With the economy still seriously ill and government in deadlock, people >> are bitter and fear for their futures, They want someone to blame for >> harm done them. This is what makes this election different and not >> comparable to previous election, where low approval rating would be much >> more telling. >> >> Regards, >> >> LelandJ >> >> > Are you talking about bigfoot or the first lady? > > Regards, > > LelandJ > >>> ________________________________ >>> From: lelandj<lela...@mail.smvfp.com> >>> To: ProFox Email List<profox@leafe.com> >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2012 4:14 PM >>> Subject: Re: [OT] good news if true >>> >>> It's way to early to be publishing, who is going to "lose" the >>> election. LOL Most polls focus on who is likely to win an election. >>> >>> This poll is obviously pure rubbish and based on President Obama's >>> current approval ratings in the various states. What about the approval >>> rating of Congress? What about the approval rating of whoever energies >>> as the Republican nominee? The percent of error in this kind of trash >>> is probably around 50%, LOL, or higher, if a candidate from a third >>> party enters the fray. >>> >>> As Mark Twain once said: There are lies, damn lies, and then there's >>> statistics. LOL >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> LelandJ >>> >>> >>> On 02/01/2012 02:52 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote: >>>> Didn't even look did you? Shoes presidential approval rating and >>>> extrapolates his chances of reelection based on that. Sad commentary on >>>> the miserable job don by the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania. >>>> >>>> >>>> Michael Oke, II >>>> 661-349-6221 >>>> >>>> Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated >>>> recipient. >>>> >>>> On Feb 1, 2012, at 12:51 PM, lelandj<lela...@mail.smvfp.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> They're publishing polls numbers already, and we don't even know the >>>>> Republican nominee that will be running against him yet. LOL >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> LelandJ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02/01/2012 02:12 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: >>>>>> http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/gallup-state-numbers-predict-huge-obama-loss/352881 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- >>>>>> multipart/alternative >>>>>> text/plain (text body -- kept) [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4f29c34e....@mail.smvfp.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1328138517.29772.yahoomail...@web125604.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
