>>BTW I sent links to Fre.., I mean Craig's blog entry for the VFPCompression >>library twice earlier and they never came through to the list.
Yes. they did. Not only they got here, I am already experimenting with the class. It is very fast and simple. Thanks for that. As for the suggestion to experiment with varios options of cursortoxml, by all means, I will Have a nice weekend Rafael El 23/09/2011 17:15, Richard Kaye escribió: > If you're curious enough, step through it in the debugger.<g> My guess would > be that CURSORTOXML is nicely optimized for VFP data whereas the > cursoradapter classes have a lot of other overhead. > > I do suggest you have a play with the various options for creating the XML. > You may want to use different options than the ones in my example. > > BTW I sent links to Fre.., I mean Craig's blog entry for the VFPCompression > library twice earlier and they never came through to the list. > > -- > rk > > -----Original Message----- > From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On > Behalf Of Rafael Copquin > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 4:09 PM > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Re: xml adapter > > Yes Richard > > I worked! It created the file in less than a second! > > Why would the xmladapter take that long? I thought it would be an improvement > over cursortoxml. Weird. > > Rafael > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4e7cea02.5060...@fibertel.com.ar ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
