If you're curious enough, step through it in the debugger. <g> My guess would be that CURSORTOXML is nicely optimized for VFP data whereas the cursoradapter classes have a lot of other overhead.
I do suggest you have a play with the various options for creating the XML. You may want to use different options than the ones in my example. BTW I sent links to Fre.., I mean Craig's blog entry for the VFPCompression library twice earlier and they never came through to the list. -- rk -----Original Message----- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Rafael Copquin Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 4:09 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: xml adapter Yes Richard I worked! It created the file in less than a second! Why would the xmladapter take that long? I thought it would be an improvement over cursortoxml. Weird. Rafael _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/DF1EEF11E586A64FB54A97F22A8BD04419F2CA56A0@ACKBWDDQH1.artfact.local ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
