On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Pete Theisen <petethei...@verizon.net> wrote: > Fred Taylor wrote: >> Having been witness to this phenomena a few times over the years, I can >> honestly say that the success rate is probably in the 10% range of actually >> accomplishing the goal of saving ANY money. In more than a few of the >> cases, it was the demise of the company. (both small and large, but I will >> not divulge any names to protect the guilty) > > Hi Fred, > > Well, then what goes around comes around, no? -------------------
No you dipstick. Other people were effected in this process and everyone lost in the end. That was co workers, families, investors and owners. Why a project fails rarely is who is coding it or in what language. It is usually lost in design and plan of what to do and how to do it. I consider those two directions that have to be parallel but always create a veer away from the other lane. That split causes failure. I have seen it first hand as well as listening to others about their own version of "Death March 20xx" Much like you don't make a house without a set of plans, and then refer back to them as progress is made. -- Stephen Russell Unified Health Services 60 Germantown Court Suite 220 Cordova, TN 38018 Telephone: 888.510.2667 901.246-0159 cell _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cajidmyj2fmfchslodkiogaxqoanjbpey1vmncy4sv_4o5gv...@mail.gmail.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
