Your loop, based on Received: headers, newer at the top, older at
the bottom:
Received: from xavier.example.com (209.216.111.114) by
CO1PEPF000044F7.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.241.197) with Microsoft S
Received: from localhost by xavier.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
30B17305F4A07; Fri, 11 Aug 2023 11:57:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xavier.example.com ([209.216.111.115]) by localhost (amavis,
port 11024) with ESMTP id HL0GE5Q4v_xp; Fri, 11 Aug 2023
Received: from NAM11-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (using TLSv1.2
with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
Received: from CY5PR04CA0018.namprd04.prod.outlook.com by
SA1PR02MB9916.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:
Received: from CY4PEPF0000EE3E.namprd03.prod.outlook.com by
CY5PR04CA0018.outlook.office365.com (2603:10
Received: from xavier.example.com (209.216.111.114) by
CY4PEPF0000EE3E.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.242.18) with Microsoft SM
In summary:
1 xavier.example.com ([209.216.111.114]) sends a message to Microsoft
2 After some internal hops, Microsoft sends the message to the
inbound MX xavier.example.com (209.216.111.115) for company A, B,
which filters it with amavis.
3 GOTO 1.
Which step is in error?
Wietse
_______________________________________________
Postfix-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
