On 17/01/2023 23:13, raf wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 03:31:43PM +0000, sa212+post...@cyconix.com wrote:
(2) Mail to unknown user 'unkn...@example.com':
valias: "@example.com @example.com, f...@external.org"
vmailbox: "@example.com example.com/foo/"
<snipped>
Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual mailbox table;
from=<f...@example.com> to=<"unkn...@example.com, foo"@external.org>
I'm not suprised that it didn't work. I would have thought that "@example.com"
is not a valid alias target since it's not a valid email address. That might
not be the reason that it didn't work, but it would make sense.
It doesn't look good, but the virtual mailbox does allow an address of
this form, so the virtual alias might be expected to also allow it.
But, if what you say is right, then surely there's no way to both
forward *and* deliver catch-all addresses? It seems that you can do one,
or the other, but not both.
